In general, the previous section does not agree with anything when the credit is used. For example, in the next sentence, the subject is feminine plural and the direct object (of gifts) is masculine plural, but no agreement is added to the partizip purchased past: basically, this is good news when it comes to spoken language. In everyday French, past participles rarely change their pronunciation. At the GCSE level, the most important past section to which its pronunciation changes is, in fact, that of the reflexive verb to sit (sitting), which will sit > sitting. The last “s” is not pronounced in the masculine form, but in the feminine form (like a z sound). In these cases, one can therefore wonder whether the reflexive pronoun is the direct or indirect object. In practice, you`ll see differences as to whether or not the previous section fits the subject of these verbs (and grammarians who specify “rules” whether the participle matches or not, but with little justification in both directions). What for? Because if these verbs are used non-pronominally with a noun, they need a preposition, which means that the noun is an indirect object. So if this preposition + object is replaced by a reflexive pronoun, the pronoun is also indirect. There are other cases where the non-reflexive verb never assumes a direct object, but where it is clearer from the meaning than in the reflexive form, the reflexive pronoun is the indirect object (and therefore does not coincide with the participation of the past). For example, the verb plaîre always assumes an indirect object in the expression plaîre à qn: in reflexive verbs, the general scheme is that the past partizip coincides with the subject of the verb: in this case, you can get past participles that end with a consonant and change their pronunciation.
For example: (5) The reflexive pronoun can be a direct or indirect object of the verb with which it is used. All pronominal verbs are verbs to be in compound tenses and humors such as the compound past tense, which means that the partipies of the past tense must coincide with their subjects – at least in theory. In fact, it`s not that simple. There are cases of reflexive verbs where the reflexive pronoun actually represents an indirect object, usually with the meaning of “to myself”, to oneself”, “to oneself”, etc. For example: Pronominal verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here`s the trick: consent is only required if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. Thus, to know whether past participation should coincide, it is necessary to determine the function of the reflexive pronoun. Here`s how.
For example, the female form of fallen (fallen) fell; the plural form of alle went. As you might expect, we don`t add another -s if the previous section already ends with -s. Thus, the partizip past from sitting (sitting) sitting remains in the masculine plural (although it becomes seated or seated in the feminine singular and plural). Here are some other tips for knowing if the reflexive pronoun is direct or indirect: here babies are the direct object (the “thing that is weighed”) and so the past participates coincides. without changing the debate on the past of the participle. (4) When a question is asked in the Past Compound with inversion, the auxiliary verb precedes the subject pronoun; the reflexive pronoun always precedes the auxiliary verb. In a negative question with inversion, is always put in front of the reflexive pronoun and not comes just before the past participation. He washed himself: He washed himself, it is said that the verb for reflexive verbs has the behavior of the verb, so if we say “he washed himself”, we could say “he washed himself” (even if it is not perfect French). The direct object is to have “himself” after the verb, so no correspondence. “Himself” becomes s in the sentence “he washed himself”, in this case it is to have before the verb, so there is a correspondence, but it is masculine, so no change. Let`s take another example: she washed herself, there is an agreement, let`s explain why: She washed herself maybe she washed herself, so she became female, stands in front of the verb to have, there is a correspondence between the past participle and the direct object, so it takes a last e for washed! So, in this case, the leg comes before the verb and therefore the past section is feminine, although the subject, it, is masculine. BUT the second rule sets out an exception to the general rule of compliance with the COD that precedes, namely that there is NO agreement of the past participle if the COD is the pronoun “in” (see here).
This applies to all cases of the above rule. In compound tenses such as the compound past tense, reflexive verbs use being as the helping (auxiliary) verb. The reflexive pronoun remains before the conjugated auxiliary form of being as follows: (d) In a sentence with a reflexive verb and a direct object pronoun, the reflexive pronoun is always the indirect object, so that the past partizip does not correspond to the reflexive pronoun. BUT, the past partizip must match the direct object pronoun, according to the rules for matching direct object pronouns. They had fun: they had fun. Remember that the correspondence with “se” and not with the sibject is “they”, “se” means “themselves”, so to have feminine and plural, before the verb there is a correspondence. If the COD does not match after the participle = > (a) For most reflexive verbs that are not followed by a noun, the reflexive pronoun is the direct object. For these verbs, the past participation must coincide with the reflexive pronoun.
Of course, when the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, that pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with the latter. However, since the direct object now precedes the verb, the past participle is subject to the direct correspondence of the object. However, when it comes to the chord, it works like having the verb, oops, the verb to be acts like having? Yes, we need a few examples to better understand it, but look at the lesson on the coincidence of the past participle with the verb first to have. They squeezed each other: they clung to their arms, here “se” is a direct object, since the verb is to squeeze someone, is for themselves (they have squeezed themselves or each other), so there is an agreement: tight! They shook hands, where is the direct object here? it is “the hand” (they shook hands), the direct object is after the verb, so not to have a match. In this case, “se” is an indirect object because we can say: they shook hands with themselves. Thus, when used reflexively, the participation of the past remains immutable because the reflexive pronoun is considered indirect: we found that native French speakers in everyday language do not tend to make past participatory agreements with having while they are the norm in formal writing. The same goes for reflexive verbs. For example, the formal written form of this sentence has a past participle correspondence with the direct object: here are some points to keep in mind when using reflexive verbs in the Compound Past: As you can see, in this case, it is the norm that the past partizip “corresponds” to the direct object (the) when it is in front of the verb. I washed myself (reflexive), but I washed the car, with the verb to have.
However, if in these cases the direct object precedes the verb, then the past section coincides with this direct object: to summarize the lesson on the correspondence of the past participle, we can say: – There is a correspondence between the past section and the direct object if the direct object must be had before the verb. However, if the direct object precedes the past section, the past participation actually corresponds to that direct object. So, for example: in fact, to say that past participation coincides with the direct object turns out to be a better explanation. This is better because the same rule then explains what happens for some rarer cases of reflexive verbs where the reflexive pronoun is not really the direct object. The most common reflexive verb in which the previous section could change its pronunciation is to sit > it sat. In most other common reflexive verbs, the partizip of the past tense ends with a vowel. For example, in she got dressed, the extra -e does not change the pronunciation. This is the simplest case.
In the case of normal (i.e. non-reflexive) verbs that assume to be, the participation of the past always coincides with the subject. .
