In a similar agreement with APIG, Alphabet`s Google (GOOGL. O) the remuneration of the information content is linked to the use of its “News Showcase” service, a condition condemned by the French competition authority. [nL1N2OP0GH But he was motivated by France`s realization that two of its closest allies had been secretly negotiating for months. According to interviews with U.S. and British officials, the Australians turned to the new administration shortly after President Biden`s inauguration, saying they had concluded that they would have to pull out of a $60 billion deal with France to provide them with a dozen attack submarines. However, it was unclear how they would end the deal with France, which was already over budget and overdue. The “term sheet” will soon be followed by a framework agreement that will allow APIG members to sign individual licenses with Facebook, the source said. By that time, the Australians not only knew that the program was dead, but they had almost sealed the agreement in principle with Washington and London. The U.S. social media group did not provide details on the content of the deal.
It has already signed a license with Le Monde on the use of the newspaper`s content, said the boss of the Le Monde group Louis Dreyfus. PARIS, Oct 21 (Reuters) – Facebook (FB. O) announced Thursday that it has signed a preliminary copyright agreement with a lobby group of French news publishers that has paved the way for payment for information content on their platforms in France. “Even though the pivot has been described as a pivot to Asia without turning away from another place, it`s simply not possible,” Richard Fontaine, executive director of the Center for a New American Security, which has long-standing ties to Australian and U.S. players in the deal, said Wednesday. To do more in one area means to do less in another. There will be two types of licenses, the source said: one for the use of news content on Facebook`s main platform and one for the upcoming Facebook news service, which will organize stories from a selected line of posts. And only out of 30. In August, when the French and Australian defence and foreign ministers held their annual “consultation”, they issued a joint statement stating that the two countries were determined to deepen their cooperation in the defence industry and “underline the importance of the Future Submarine programme”. The result was an explosion that has now led to a lively breach of trust with one of America`s oldest allies. U.S. officials insist it was not their job to talk to the French about their business with Australia.
But now, in the face of the explosion, some officials say they regret not insisting that the Australians used to catch up with the French on their intentions. Frequent courtesy expressions: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200, More But U.S. officials have known for years that turning to Asia could strain relations with European allies. While former President Barack Obama first adopted the phrase “pivot” to describe America`s movement toward the region of the world where its economic and strategic interests are greatest — as a basketball player, he clung to the sports metaphor — his White House eventually banned the public use of the term due to European objections. Conventionally powered French submarines, the Australians feared, would be obsolete when delivered. They expressed interest in finding a fleet of quieter nuclear submarines based on US and British designs that could patrol areas of the South China Sea with less risk of detection. By the time the Biden administration began seriously informing Australia and Britain of its emerging strategy to fight China, a three-year-old contract worth $60 billion or more for a dozen submarines, most of which were to be built by the French, was already fluctuating, U.S. officials said.
The submarines were based on propulsion technology so limited in its range and so easy for the Chinese to recognize that it would be obsolete when the first submarines were launched, perhaps even in 15 years. In one meeting after another with their French counterparts, U.S. officials gave no indication of their intention to overthrow France`s largest defense treaty. Biden did not mention the plans in a friendly conversation with Mr. Biden. Macron at a summit in June in Cornwall, where they sat in sun loungers by the sea and talked about the future of the Atlantic alliance. (Mr. Biden, Mr.
Johnson and Mr. Morrison met the same day, discussed the impending deal and, in a vague statement that seems more revealing today than then, referred to “deepening strategic cooperation between the three governments” to deal with a changing defense environment in the Indo-Pacific.) Three days later, Morrison met separately with Macron, but left no impression that he was reconsidering the deal, the Frenchman stressed. There was an obvious alternative: the type of nuclear-powered submarines used by the Americans and the British. But U.S. and Australian officials agreed that if the French got wind of the fact that one of the biggest defense treaties in their history would be terminated, they would almost certainly try to sabotage the alternative plan, according to officials familiar with the talks between Washington and Canberra. .
